Misrepresentation
A considerable number of anti-abortion visuals feature
an almost fully developed fetus. Abortions preformed at this stage via
hysterotomy or D&X abortions are rare. Only about 1.5% of abortions
are performed at 21-weeks or older, according to according to a 2000
study conducted by the Nation
Center for Chronic Disease (CDC). A July
1992 LIFE magazine article, The Great Divide, reported that
Reverend Robert Schenk, member of anti-choice coalition Operation
rescue, attended a demonstration outside an abortion clinic in Buffalo,
NY, with "Baby Tia", a 7-inch, gray-tinted and formaldehyde-soaked dead
fetus. In the escalating madness of the crowd, the fetus was dropped
onto the sneaker-trodden street. Authorities arrested Schenk and
confiscated the fetus, which was taken to a coroner, only to be
identified as an approximately 20-week-old stillborn. The article
reads, "Many
pro-choice supporters in Buffalo are angry about the distance between
their
reality-what they see in the clinics-and the images the
anti-abortionists present as fact. 'What they are showing to the public
is a lie,' says Joni Ladowski, a nurse at a nearby clinic, as she
unfolds a length of gauze. In the center lies what appears to be a clot
the size of a peanut. It is a fetus, nine
weeks old. 'This is an abortion,'
she says."
|
|
Tear-drop baby
First used in the anti-abortion campaign by Dr. J.C. Willke, president
and founder of International Right to Life, in his 1971 book, Handbook
on Abortion, this picture has circulated through anti-choice brochures
and websites without much
question of its origin or accuracy.
This picture depicts a ruptured tubal
pregnancy that Willke would like you to believe is 6-weeks-old.
A 6-week-old fetus,
from crown-to-rump, measures 4-5
mm, according to William's Obstetrics, or 1/6-1/5 inch (the size of a
BB pellet). The fetus in the photo, when compared to the fingers
holding it, appears to be about an inch in length or the size of an 8-
to 10-week-old fetus.
|
|
|
We have also posted a photo of
a 6-week-old fetus that was published in A Child is Born, by Lennart
Nilsson. The two are demonstrably different! Accurately labeling the
fetus's gestational age is important because this photo represents the
mortality of developing life. One may look at this picture and see a
fetus only into its second month of development and think, "look how
far it's come." But when labeled accurately, this fetus would be
approaching its second trimester, a period when only 12% of abortions
are performed, according to the CDC abortion surveillance.
The least apparent, yet possibly
the most disturbing element of this photo is its attribution. Although
the caption
reads, "Photo by Robert Wolfe, with permission Bell Museum of
Pathology, University of Minnesota," the Bell
Museum at U of M is a natural history museum; it always has been. And
when we asked Willke for information from his copy, he said it was
simply not in his possession anymore. This photo gained its popularity
partially because of Willke, yet he doesn't even have his original copy.
|
|
Gestational Age
Accurately labeling
the fetus in a picture is a testament to the source's credibility.
Unfortunately, a collection of pro-life web sites and brochures label
their pictures through a method inconsistent with medical practices.
Gestational age can be labeled by the date of conception or by the last
menstrual cycle. The medical establishment goes by the latter. However,
when I asked Willke which method he used, he replied in an email, "This
all depends on the picture, the source references and the use in
reference." Willke labeled the picture to the right as a 10-week-old
fetus in his book, Handbook on Abortion. However, it was later
identified as a 12- to 14-week-old fetus by Dr. Andrew Ross, Denver
ob-gyn. Apparently, consistency was not a priority in the
identification of this photo, nor were the standards
of the medical community.
|
|
|
Malachi
Malachi, the literal poster-child for the anti-choice campaign, is a
gruesome example of inaccuracy. The back of this 3 x 5 inch card claims
that the fetus's life ends in pain. However, judging from the fetus's
gray skin, it was aborted via laminaria through an intra-amniotic
injection or was done to preserve the mother's
life, Andrew Ross. If the procedure was
done while the fetus was alive, its skin would be the pinkish color of
its left leg.
|
Choice is Abortion
This picture, also distributed on a 3 x 5 inch card and used in
numerous anti-abortion campaigns is equally inconsistent. If the
forceps securing its head over the jar are standard OR ring forceps,
the ring is 1 x 0.5 centimeters, which would mean that the head is too
small to be in
its third trimester, yet one less developed would not have that much
hair, says Dr. Ross. "I strongly suspect that this picture is fake, and
the information on the back of the card certainly does not match what's
shown," he adds. The second, and most obvious, fallacy lies within the
description. It says that the pictured fetus was aborted in 1987 in
Texas. However, that was the year that third trimester abortions were
banned, rendering the alleged procedure altogether illegal.
|
Photograph from Foundation for Life
10900 NW Freeway #112
Houston, TX 77092
|
Fetal Brain Waves
The National Right to Life Committee released a
pamphlet, When Does Life Begin, which states that at six weeks, a fetus
has measurable brain waves detected by a an electroencephalogram. But
using hard-to-pronounce medical terms to gain credibility does not add
substance to this dubious claim. Even at 7-weeks into development, a
fetus's brain is the
size of a pinhead. Detecting minute brain activity through all the
muscle contractions that go on inside a woman's mid-region is a
medically unsubstantiated assertion that has not been published in any
peer-reviewed journal.
The same pamphlet also cites an article, "What the
fetus feels," from the British Medical Journal. This article, lacking
any references to studies, supports the organization's claim that the
fetus can feel pain. However, in its conclusion, it reads "It is hardly
surprising that
infants delivered by difficult forceps extraction act as if they have a
sever headache." A severe headache?!? How does a newly delivered infant
act as if it has a severe headache? This article is simply an example
of
how anti-choice activists use flawed sources and fallacious information
to prove
an often medically-unsubstantiated point.
For example, Willke, despite outright refutes from The National Cancer
Institute, the American Cancer Society, and the American Coalition of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists, insists that abortion causes breast
cancer.
More Information on images, fetal pain,
embryology and fetal personhood:
|
This photo first appeared in the
book "Handbook on Abortion", written by Dr. & Mrs J.C. Willke
and published in 1971. The caption reads: "This is the result of
one morning's
work in a Canadian teaching hospital."
Prior to 1969, abortion was completely illegal in Canada. From 1969
to1988 abortion was highly restricted and women who needed
abortions had
to have their cases heard by Therapeutic Abortion Committees, three
doctors, who would decide if their abortions were "medically
necessary". Many women were turned down. Dr. Morgentaler did perform
abortions but his clinics
were illegal and he went to jail for ten months.
With draconian abortion laws in place it's impossible that several
"babies" would be aborted routinely on a daily basis. In addition,
hospitals don't throw fetuses in Gladbag-lined bins. It apppears
that the fetuses/babies in the photo are either premature deliveries or
stillbirths "arranged" for the photo shoot by anti abortion hospital
staff.
|
What does an early
abortion look like?
When
does
the embryo fetus become human?
Although a fetus may show some
response to a noxious stimulus, this is a reflex response
at least until 26 weeks gestation, as nerve fibres
responsible for pain do not begin to reach higher brain areas until
26 to 34 weeks gestation. Source: Medical
Practitioners Board of Victoria: http://www.dhs.vic.gov.au/ahs/archive/report/report3.htm
More on fetal pain: The Journal of the American Medical
Association: http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/294/8/947
On one pro
life site it is claimed that: "the cortex
isn’t needed to feel pain. The thalamus is needed and is
functioning at 8 weeks. Even complete removal of the cortex does not
eliminate the sensation of pain. "Indeed there seems to be little
evidence that pain information reaches the sensory cortex." http://www.abortionfacts.com/online_books/love_them_both/why_cant_we_love_them_both_14.asp
What the thalamus does is act as a sorting and switching station
located deep inside the brain. The thalamus quickly forwards the pain
message simultaneously to three specialized regions of the brain: the
physical sensation region (somatosensory cortex), the emotional feeling
region (limbic system) and the thinking region (frontal cortex). Your
brain responds to pain by sending messages that moderate the pain in
the spinal cord. http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/pain/PN00017
Even with a fully functioning thalamus sorting and sending messages, if
the cortex is not developed enough to receive them, there will be no
consciousness or feeling of pain.
Links to human
embryology sites
|
|